Opinion: The Constitutional and Moral Flaws of “One Man, One Vote, One Shilling

By :Antonellah Kakuko Director of Digital Communications, UDA Party

The “one man, one vote, one shilling” principle championed by Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua is not only unconstitutional but also discriminatory towards Kenya’s marginalized communities.

This policy threatens to exacerbate existing inequalities by neglecting the unique needs of less developed regions, undermining the nation’s goal of equitable growth.

The Constitution mandates that resources be distributed in a manner that addresses economic disparities within and among counties.

This provision aims to remedy historical injustices and ensure all regions develop harmoniously. By focusing solely on population as the basis for resource allocation, the proposed principle ignores these constitutional requirements, failing to consider the distinct challenges faced by underdeveloped areas.

As a child from a pastoralist background, I am deeply concerned that Gachagua’s stance implies that regions like Lamu, Tana River, Garissa, Isiolo, Turkana, Taita Taveta, Marsabit, Baringo, Samburu, and West Pokot are less important to the nation.

This approach risks further marginalizing these areas, which have historically been neglected.

Equitable resource allocation must account for various factors, including economic disparities and the need for affirmative action to support disadvantaged regions and groups.

The Constitution emphasizes equality and equity to achieve true fairness. Treating every region the same, regardless of their specific needs and challenges, is inherently unequal and unjust.

While population should be a factor in resource allocation, it should not be the sole determinant. Equity demands that we consider the unique circumstances and development needs of each region.

The marginalized communities have been sidelined for far too long, and it is time to rectify this imbalance. Our call for “one man, one kilometer, one shilling” reflects our demand for fair and just treatment in resource allocation.

Kenya belongs to all of us, and concentrating prosperity in only one region is dangerous and unjust.

The equitable development of all regions, including the northern and southern parts of Kenya, is essential for the country’s rapid and balanced growth. It is time for all communities, regardless of their geographical location, to receive the attention and resources they deserve.